Why are women artists undervalued as compared to men artists? The undervaluation of women artists compared to their male counterparts can be attributed to a complex interplay of historical, social, and economic factors. Historically, the art world has been male-dominated, with women facing limited opportunities for education and exhibition. This has led to a scarcity of women artists in art history, influencing perceptions of artistic merit. Social expectations and stereotypes about gender roles also contribute to the undervaluation of women’s art. Deep-seated beliefs about the nature of creativity and artistic genius, often associated with masculinity, can lead to unconscious biases favoring male artists. These biases may affect how critics, curators, and collectors assess and value artworks. Economic factors play a role as well. The art market is driven by demand, and historical undervaluation can create a self-perpetuating cycle where women artists may have fewer opportunities to command high prices or gain prominence in major collections. Efforts to address these issues involve promoting gender diversity in exhibitions, publications, and collections, as well as challenging traditional notions of artistic merit. Advocacy for equal opportunities, increased visibility for women artists, and a reevaluation of historical biases contribute to fostering a more inclusive and equitable art world.